Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5120
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sinha, Navin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sakkarnaikar, Fakkiresh | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-21T09:25:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-21T09:25:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Sinha, N., & Sakkarnaikar, F. (2023). Review jurisprudence in India: Exploring India’s proportionality experience. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 24(2), 101–117. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2024030400006401293764443 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1839-4191 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5120 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article explores the application of the proportionality principle by the Supreme Court of India. It argues that although the principle is accepted as an integral part of review jurisprudence in India, the courts apply it only in form and not substance. In other words, in applying proportionality, the Court rarely engages with alternative measures that could be considered in place of the measure that is being challenged. To show this, the authors consider some recent cases in which the Supreme Court has applied the proportionality principle. © 2023 The Authors. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | en | - |
dc.publisher | Australian Journal of Asian Law - Melbourne University Law Review | - |
dc.title | Review Jurisprudence in India: Exploring India's Proportionality Experience | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles GNLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Review jurisprudence in India: Exploring India's proportionality experience | 492.11 kB | image/png | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.